|
My
journey of equine
experience began in the summer of nineteen forty and six, over,
under, around and on the back of one my
grandfather’s huge draft horses. In retrospect, judging by
what I know now of
horses and her extraordinary compassionate gentleness, I am certain she
must
have been the equivalent to my ‘equine guardian
angel.’ Occasionally swinging
lightly on her tail, crawling between and hugging her front or back
legs,
tugging on her mane and forelock to bring her head within reach and the
occasional crashing of my wiggly stack of chairs, boxes and other
paraphernalia
I used for a ‘mounting block’ were only a few of
the suicidal antics she more
than graciously tolerated. But those visits were forbidden interludes
of joyous
ecstacy mixed with unequal proportions of reality and fantasy. Yet if a
small
child can feel a deep sense of reverence and belonging with an animal,
I did
with Jewel.
Admittedly,
although each time I
was caught, I received what I felt was overzealous corporeal punishment
that
escalated proportionately from the last ‘whuppin,’
it never seemed to
completely deter my insatiable need to be near or on a horse.
In stark
contrast, my father
couldn’t replace his work team fast enough with one of those
‘new-fangled tractors’
(a John Deere Model AR.) It had no starter, (hand-pull on the flywheel)
no
rubber tires (steel wheels) and was started on gasoline after opening
the
‘petcocks’ (compression release) and then was
switched over to fuel oil after
it had ‘warmed up.’ But it was his ‘pride
and joy.’ Many years later, I found
this difference of values between us a probable vexation that escalated
our all
too many confrontations.
Of course her
‘brakes’ were
wherever she decided to stop and graze in the pasture, get a drink of
water at
the creek or hang out with the rest of the herd. To remedy this, I had
tried to
rig a rather ineffective halter/bridle out of an old piece of binder
twine by
wrapping and knotting a loose loop around her nose trailing two long
pieces
onto her back for reins. My final ‘bridle prototype
evaluation’ came about when
she innocently swished her nose at a fly biting just above one of her
front
hooves. Of course I wasn’t paying close attention at the time
and had wrapped
the binder twine around my hands several times so I wouldn’t
‘drop the reins.’
Her rather swift reaction to the fly biting her leg unintentionally
jerked me
to flip head over heels and plop down right in front of her. She
graciously
ignored me and continued nonchalantly grazing around me as if a small
child
acrobatically somersaulting off her back in front of her was an
everyday
occurrence. Consequently, (while looking up at the sky filled with
tiny,
sparkling bright dots and desperately trying to regain the breath that
had been
knocked out of me) I determined this particular method of bovine
manipulation
to be flawed beyond my reconciliation. As I trudged achingly back to
the barn
for yet another handful of feed for remounting, I decided to give up
the ‘reins
and bridle’ tack altogether and instead settled on a fairly
simple arrangement.
That
‘fairly simple arrangement’
was using a dried corn stalk that I would manage to drag along up on
her back
with me when I ‘mounted up.’ With it, I could turn
her one way or another by
leaning forward, reaching out and gently tapping it under her chin on
the
opposite side of the direction I chose to go. Occasionally when she
would graze
in one spot or hang around the rest of the herd too long, I would
gently tap on
her rear so we could ‘mosey on down the trail.’
*The corn stalk
proved doubly
advantageous serving a secondary purpose as my trusty rifle.
Of course,
given the frailty of
the old dried corn stalk, it did not always provide enough incentive to
elicit
satisfactory ‘forward motion.’ When that happened,
I would turn around facing
her rear and swish her tail back and forth to thump her back legs and
sides
with it. More often than not, a
‘ragged-corn-stalk-flapping/tail swishing
combination’ got us moving again. Unfortunately, given the
size of her huge
barreled body and my tiny legs, I was often forced to ride backwards
desperately clutching her hip bones (in what could only be viewed by an
onlooker as some weird bovine bear hug) until she decided to stop. As
the
months went by, I developed better balance and grip, and would often
stand on
her back vaulting, somersaulting and trick riding’ as she
would compliantly
mosey along, completely oblivious to my daring feats of horsemanship.
(?cowmanship?)
And yes, there
were numerous
times in the beginning when my attempted feats of daring
horsemanship/cowmanship would cause bruised and aching trips back to
the barn
for another handful of feed to once again painfully
‘remount.’ But I learned
balance, ‘centered riding’ and riding WITH the
horse to a level that the
privileged peers in my age group (or those much older) could only dream
about.
In my early
adolescence, I had
studied Jung and Freud as well as various Far Eastern religions. While
my
personal preference and beliefs were more along the lines of Abraham
Maslow, I
became disenchanted with the psychiatric world as a whole due to the
fact that
for every model and theorem, there seemed to be an opposing one of
equal
validity. Even though I later studied Skinner, Thorndike and a
multitude of
others, I never completely forgot the monk who paused to pick up the
beetle in
his path and place it on the side of the road.
As a child,
I’d always seemed to
have an intrinsic understanding of sorts working with animals of
different
species, whether it was a dog, cat, sheep, pigeon, pig or cow. Yet
something
seemed to be ‘missing’ with the horse. That
‘missing something’ (coupled with
my disillusionment of present day ‘training
formats’) only served to aggravate
Nikki’s constant reminders that I was ‘doing
something wrong.’
Thus my journey
began of rather
intense studies that included not only conspecific ethological
sciences, but
conditioning, physiology, hoof care and nutrition as well (often
referred to as
Total Environmental Enrichment).
Waring,
McDonnell, Beck,
McGreevey, Kiley-Worthington, MacLean,
and many others soon led me to Budiansky, MacFadden,
Simpson, Griffen,
Rollin, Wallace, Pinker, Radner, and Povinelli (amongst many others).
Which in
turn brought me full circle back to Darwin, Romannes, Morgan,
Thorndike,
Pavlov, Kohler, Lorenz and Skinner.
This left me
going in several
directions at the same time. One direction was the ODGs starting with
Xenophon.
I found it
interesting that the
writings of a mercenary were so highly regarded by some in e the horse
world as
many of his beliefs displayed an ignorance and lack of understanding
that was
completely counterproductive to the level of horsemanship I had come to
respect. But then given the training practices of his day, I would
suppose he
should be given due credit for ‘being ahead of his
time.’ Ironic that (in both
Welebny and Marchant’s translations) it is noted that had
this relatively poor
soldier of fortune not plundered the estate of the wealthy Asidates in
his
escapades, he would not have had the time and luxury he did, and the
world
would never have heard of “the Art of
Horsemanship,” Annabasis, Hellenica, (or
any of his other writings).
This led me
into delving deeply
into the 6,000 year-old history of the horse/human relationship (major
food
source, pack animal, (milk, meat, skins) then the advancement of the
wheel and
various pulled vehicles and finally mounted interactive activity. Of
course
that included all the reading material I could lay my hands on or read
by de
Pluvinel, (my ODG hero as he claimed that the use of the spur or the
whip was a
confession of failure) Grisone, Pagnatelli, Gueriniere and even the
ruthless,
maniacal Fiaschi. That in turn led to De Kunffy and Podhajsky and
others as
well as Mary Wanless and Sally Swift who, upon learning of my quest,
graciously
gifted me an autographed copy of her “Centered Riding
II.”
The other
direction of study was
mental/emotional aspects of the Horse (which also split into two
groups;
Neurological/Psychological and Epistemological and Ontological).
*Anecdotally,
it was interesting
to note the mutual incomprehension and disdain the two groups (literary
intellectuals and scientists) share for each other.
Thus I found
myself bouncing
back and forth between the ethologists and the
neuroscience/neuropsychology of
Allen, McDonnell, Bekoff, Kiley-Worthington, McLean, Griffin, Ledoux,
Waring,
McGreevy, Grandin,
Dennett,
Morgan, Nagel, Block,
Davidson and others. Through the years, those I found especially
insightful
were by Andy Beck, “The Secret Life of the Horse,”
Sue McDonnell’s “Equid
Ethogram,” and Jaak Panksepp’s,
“Affective Neuroscience.”
As nonverbal
communication and
‘personal space’ are integral components of equine
culture, I was also led to
the study of kinesics and proxemics (which included the works of Hall,
Sommer,
Tubbs, Moss, Birdwhistell, Ekman, Freisen, Bateson, Mead and others).
At that point,
several things
became obviously paramount.
#1. After six
thousand years of
‘practice,’ the horse world was still filled with a
plethora of recurring
‘horse problems’ each generation. Although true (as
evidenced in any equine
related email list or magazine) it seemed highly illogical that a
species as
aggressively dominant and supposedly intelligent as Homo Sapiens
(combined with
our technical advances) would still have such difficulty and inability
perfecting a singular successful model of interaction for that length
of time
(especially so with a species that had remained virtually unchanged
during that
same time period).
#2. The terms
affiliated
pairing, nonsexual bonding, peer attachment, mutually beneficial
coalitions and
preferred associates were the desperate attempts of ethologists to
avoid any
taint of anthropomorphism. Though the word
‘friendship’ has a commonality of understanding
and acceptance in any culture worldwide, it seemed they regarded it as
trivial.
In short, it was recognized, duly registered and then passed over by
not only
equine ethologists and research scientists, but the world of horse
owners and
‘trainers’ as well.
#3. The
conclusive empirical
acceptance of animal emotions/awareness and self-consciousness is still
debatable amongst those avid members of academia (though recently, the
majority
are more than grudgingly acknowledging both animal emotions and
self-awareness). Until they resolve those issues of Cartesian dualism
and
others, I was forced to content myself with my own and other personal
observations and associative experiences.
I have had a
‘true friend’ in
life. In fact, I have been blessed with several. I have felt anger,
humiliation, grief, envy and the hollow, empty depression of absolute
submission (learned helplessness). If I see comparable conspecific
identifiable
traits in the Horse, I reach the conclusion (without 'humanizing') that
horses
DO have feelings and emotions. If one firmly believes horses do not
have
emotions, that they do not 'suffer,' I would wish them well and
strongly
suggest taking into account numerous empirical articles and
documentation
confirming the opposite (including grief response).
How many of us
have witnessed
the expression of a foal tripping on one of its maiden gallops in the
mud, then
slide coming to stop only to get up with what can only be a look of
bewildered,
puzzled (if not indignant) humiliation as they trot away? How many of
us have
witnessed the look of angry resentment and bitter hatred on the face of
a horse
that has been severely abused to ‘man-killer’
status as they charge at any
human that attempts to approach them? How many of us have witnessed (as
documented by Dr. Kenneth Marcella and others) the grief response and
‘stress
of loss’ reactions exhibited by the surviving horse of a peer
attachment
relationship when his equine friend has died? How many of us have
witnessed the
exasperated frustration on the face of a horse being ridden by an
abusive
unknowledgeable rider explode into the violent extrication of said
rider? How
many of us have witnessed the apprehensive dubious skepticism on the
face of a
horse that has been asked to do something directly against his survival
instincts? How many of us have witnessed the extremes of separation
anxiety
when one of a pair of bonded horses leaves the other? How many of us
have
witnessed the happy, joyful play of horses on a cool crisp morning? How
many of
us have witnessed two horses bonded in an exclusive relationship who do
not
share that level of co-dependent intimacy with any other horses in the
herd?
How many of us witnessed the quizzical ‘one cocked
ear’ curious look of a horse
investigating a new object in his environment?
The answer to
all would be far
too many witnesses to expect anyone with even a modicum of intelligence
to
continue wearing the blinders of anthropomorphic-induced fear and/or
being
accused of ‘seeing something that is not there.’
*The results of
PET scan
evaluations of mental states based on brain activity and neurochemical
changes
noted in response to specific stimuli are irrefutable. Dr.
Crowell-Davis
states, “When animals are recorded showing the same patterns
of brain activity
and the same brain chemical changes that correspond to a particular
human
emotion or mood state, it would not be logical of us to assume that
they are
not experiencing similar feelings."
If horses DO
have emotions, if
they DO have very sequential steps to form a very intimate relationship
specifically with just one other horse in the herd/band, and if this
particular
relationship is one of peaceful, harmonious, inter-reliant fellowship
that has
no use or need of the trials and tribulations of the intra-herd
dynamics that
use intimidation, pressure, comfort/discomfort or physical punishment
to assert
herd rank, then it would certainly behoove those of us who wish to
avoid the
very ‘problems’ that current training formats
actually cause and investigate
its full potential in regards to the human/equine relationship.
Yes. I believe
a horse should be
allowed to associate and grow mentally and emotionally with other
horses. Yes,
I believe that the horse must be physically mature as well as mentally
and emotionally
mature before we ‘ask too much of him’ (although
formats to increase bone mass
and bone density may be of interest). And yes sadly, I believe in the
abolishment of solitary confinement (stalling) with the exception of
injury/illness or severe inclement weather.
But that does
not mean a horse
cannot learn all his basic cue/request responses from the time he is a
weaned
without diminishing one iota his spirit. And that does not mean that he
cannot
share the same levels of intimacy, trust, communication, acceptance and
understanding with a human that he would with that one other special
(to him)
horse in the herd.
I looked to
Classical Dressage
to teach me how to position my body in a way that will allow my horse
to carry
me as efficiently and effortlessly as possible. I also want to be able
to
condition him physically to be able to carry me as efficiently and
effortlessly
as possible. (In spite of the fact that the pitfalls of human endeavor
and
tradition seem to have crept into the Dressage world as well with
stalling,
shoeing and Rollkur being only a few of the deleterious practices still
utilized and commonly accepted.) For one of the greatest deadfalls of
mounted
activity (other than ignoring instinctual equine limitations) is
establishing
the associative negative imprint of
off-balance
discomfort and rider
induced lameness.
But most
importantly, while my
horse and I learn these things together as one inter-reliant,
co-dependent (not
codependent) entity, I want to do as little harm as possible to his
mind, his
body, his heart and his spirit (Primum non Nocere).
Many years ago
my obsession and
the answers to the seemingly endless questions of
‘why,’ were still not
completely satisfied. I needed ‘more.’ More time to
study and learn unobserved,
more time to confirm my findings as well as more time to simply
interact and
spend time with what I felt was the most honest, caring, logical, noble
creature on the face of the earth (despite the fact that my peers
seemed to
regard them as a contrary, problematic frustrating beast of burden.) To
gain
more time for both observation and interaction, I relocated my
horses’ pasture
so that they completely surrounded my house.
#1. Having to
put on boots to
trudge out to the car several hundred feet away each time I leave and
return
(especially during inclement/severe weather) is an irritating,
time-consuming
daily inconvenience.
#2. It is a
pleasant ‘pain in
the neck’ when trying to plant, install, repair or do
ANYTHING outdoors because
of all the sincerely appreciated but uninvited ‘equine
interest, support and
supervision’ that I seem to immediately attract.
#3. Reaching
out from your bed
through a bedroom window and being able to touch and talk to your
horses at
night is a very unique experience (as well as offering additional
observation
for nocturnal equine patterns and habits. But if I forget to close the
window
by falling asleep watching them, it can be rather startling to be woken
up in
the wee hours of the morning by a hard push from an equine nose
accompanied
with a loud snort that could very well be interpreted as a
‘horse laugh.’
#4. I learned
that being
accepted as ‘one of the herd’ (albeit the one who
smells weird and changes his
scent, walks on his back legs and talks strangely) gives one a unique
sense of
achievement and fulfillment. Sadly (because of the frailty of the human
body)
my membership into this elite group was limited by my not being able to
‘play’
with the other members to the degree they desired.
#5. Having a
1,300 pound Standardbred
beating on your door as a reminder that you are a ‘few
minutes late with
supper’ while one of his equine cohorts is turning the door
knob at a
personally inopportune time while on an international phone call or
entertaining guests can be a bit wearisome if not exasperating (not
counting
the repairs to the door itself).
#6. No door can
ever be left
open unguarded for even a moment. Upon returning from a quick trip to
the tool
shed once, I found Able in the kitchen whinnying for help as he had
accidentally
knocked over a kitchen chair behind him and literally
‘trapped himself.’
Amazingly, he did not elicit the ‘bull in a china shop
syndrome.’
#7. No window
(especially my
bedroom window) can ever be left open unguarded. I returned from
repairing a
fence in the stallion’s pasture one day to find Sundance had
removed an
expensive comforter from my bed and was proudly prancing around with
the
largest piece of what was left of it in a manner not unlike a puppy
with a new
bone.
#7. No tool,
construction
material or outside project can be left unattended for a second. While
installing brick pavers in back patio, I had walked inside to answer a
phone
call as I had forgotten to bring the portable phone out with me. I
returned
just minutes later only to find that Sundance had proudly tipped over
the
wheelbarrow full of freshly mixed mortar,
‘relocated’ a number of the as yet
not mortared but set brick pavers and was deeply engaged in conducting
a
seminar for the rest of the herd in the proper (or perhaps improper) use of a shovel
some 50 feet away
from the patio.
#8. All doors
must be kept
locked at all times as Boss (an elderly registered Quarter Horse
rescue) taught
Sundance how to turn the knob and his young understudy succeeded once
in
gaining access to the entry hallway. (Luckily, I was home at the time
and
caught the mischievous rascal red-handed before he could ‘get
into things.’)
*This then, is
our Achilles
Heel, our ‘blind spot’ that sustains the
generational continuance of all
‘problems’ that we encounter with ANY level of
equine manipulation.
We have been so
indoctrinated
with tradition, (and traditional training perceptions and practices)
that we
have completely lost sight of the fact that the Horse is NOT a
problematic,
contrary, frustrating creature put on the face of the earth to confound
and
aggravate us. On the contrary, he is the most honest, caring, logical,
noble
creature on the face of the earth.
In truth, it is
our perceptions,
lack of understanding and methods of interaction that are the cause of
every
‘horse problem’ ever known. Only if we acknowledge
that possibility, and accept
personal responsibility for our own lack of understanding can we ever
devise a
method of interaction that PREVENTS all those
‘problems’ from ever occurring in
the first place.
This leaves us
with a ‘catch 22'
effect of first CAUSING the problems and difficulties, placing the
blame on the
Horse, and then devising methods of ‘training’ to
counteract the very problems
we caused in the first place.
Whether the
human ego can ever
acknowledge this oversight or not to any appreciable degree remains to
be seen.
But there is obvious hope in that each day more and more horse owners
are
becoming aware of the fact that ‘tradition’ has
been the greatest destructive
force to the human/equine relationship ever known.
This then is
where I find myself
after accumulating nearly 25,000 hours of research and study of the
Horse and
the human/equine relationship in the last 65 years, albeit with many
‘side
trips’ (in lieu of studying archaic ‘training
methods’).
At present, I
am deeply involved
in hopefully opening yet another ‘Pandora’s
box.’ This one being the transient
change in certain electrical properties of the skin associated with the
sweat
gland activity that is elicited by a stimulus that evokes an arousal or
orienting response. Contrary to our present day scientific beliefs, I
am given
to think that horses CAN detect our intent and emotional responses due
to our
pheromones and scent (as the horse’s sensory olfactory system
has been
completely underrated). This excursion also entails exploring the
'extended
nose - investigative approach' when two strange horses meet for exact
identification and 'determination of intent.'
Whether I am
successful in
proving this or not only time will tell. But whatever the final
conclusion, I
will at least know not only ‘what’ to my own
satisfaction but more importantly,
‘why.’
Sincerely,
Chuck Mintzlaff
& Kids
Lady, Able,
Sundance, Boss,
Rebel & Combustion
(And Nikki)
http://www.thenaturalhorse.org/
|